Language:  GlossaryImagesHelp
 
Home: USES: Fisheries and Aquaculture: Fisheries Governance: Institutions: National governance of fisheries
Advanced Search | an expanded view of Topics and Knowledge in the Atlas
 Login for Members

 Username
 
 Password
 

Forgotten your Password?

Not a Member? Join Now

 
Navigate the Atlas:
 Topic Overview
 Editors
 
National governance of fisheries
See source @ FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture ...
Text-only     Printer-friendly version             

Background

The requirement that States manage their resources sustainably is included in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in which it is stated that (Article 61):

 

"The coastal State, taking into account the best scientific evidence available to it, shall ensure through proper conservation and management measures that the maintenance of the living resources in the exclusive economic zone is not endangered by over-exploitation."

The institutional implications of this duty are explicitly stated in the voluntary FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, where it is stated that (Para 7.1.1):

"States and all those engaged in fisheries management should, through an appropriate policy, legal and institutional framework, adopt measures for the long-term conservation and sustainable use of fisheries resources."

Achieving sustainable fisheries is hindered by several problems including biological and ecological uncertainty and the tendency to pursue short-term social and economic objectives at the expense of longer-term sustainability objectives. In fisheries circles, institutional problems are also frequently referred to as being a fundamental problem, but there is considerable uncertainty as to the exact nature of these problems or, in fact, what exactly is meant by the term "institution". One definition of an institution is, "simply the set of rules actually used by a set of individuals to organise repetitive activities that produce outcomes affecting those individuals and potentially affecting others" (quoted in OECD, 1997). However, an alternative definition that is perhaps more useful within the context of fisheries is: "An institution is not only the rules themselves, it includes the process and organisations (public and private, formal and informal) that develop and implement the rules (management measures) affecting use of the fishery resources." (OECD, 1997)

Features of effective management

Based on this framework, a set of institutional features essential for effective fisheries management can be identified. This includes the following.

  • A fisheries management authority which is the legal entity which has the mandate within the State (or States in the case of an international authority) to perform specified fisheries management functions. Commonly a national fisheries management authority would be in the form of a Ministry, a Department within a Ministry or an agency. While many fisheries management authorities are government bodies, they could be government, parastatal or private.
  • The fisheries management authority should have the capacity for, or recourse to services which provide, the following functions:
    • the collection of detailed information on the fishery, including: data on catches such as total landings and discards and the species composition of these and the size or age structure of catches; data on the nature, timing and distribution of fishing effort; and information on the social and economic characteristics of the each fishery and its sub-units;
    • the analysis of the relevant information to identify trends in the resources and ecosystem, and in the performance of the fishery to allow for the appropriate modification of the management measures to ensure that the objectives for the fishery are being achieved;
    • consideration of all relevant information in a decision-making process, which must include appropriate participation by the key stakeholders, in order to select appropriate management measures and ensure effective, sustainable management (developing the rules);
    • monitoring, control and surveillance, designed to encourage compliance with the management measures and, where necessary, to enforce the regulations (implementing the rules).

The institutional implications of this duty are explicitly stated in the voluntary FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, where it is stated that (Para 7.1.1):

"States and all those engaged in fisheries management should, through an appropriate policy, legal and institutional framework, adopt measures for the long-term conservation and sustainable use of fisheries resources."

In fisheries, two institutional weaknesses have been identified as being particularly important. These are the widespread existence of inappropriate mechanisms and approaches for regulating access to a particular fishery, and the failure to include the key stakeholders in the management process. Much of the emphasis in improving fisheries management in recent years has been on addressing these two features.

 
 
 
 
All  (5) News   (2) Websites   (2) Documents   (1)
 All
 
News
Websites
The Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS) is a scientific agency within the department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry - Australia (AFFA), at the interface between science and policy. Bureau of Rural Sciences Australia The Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS) is a scientific agency within the department...  
Website on FAO's Special Programme for Food Security Special Programme for Food Security Website on FAO's Special Programme for Food Security Editor's Choice
Documents
A paper on shifting ecosystems references and perceptions Shifting Baselines: slow motion disaster in the sea A paper on shifting ecosystems references and perceptions 
979 Topics - 5229 Related Knowledge - 11257 Members - 47 Editors
freeMem:210,881,760 totMem:487,194,624 reqNum:1128848 openSessions:0 generationTime:2013/05/26 00:00:20